By: The daily torch media
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has taken the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to court over allegations of missing N55.9 billion meant for election materials in the 2019 general elections.
The funds were earmarked for crucial election materials, including smart card readers, ballot papers, and result sheets.
SERAP is seeking an order of mandamus to compel INEC to account for the missing funds and disclose the names of contractors paid the N55.9 billion, including their directors and shareholders. The allegations are based on the Auditor-General’s report, which highlighted irregularities in the procurement process, including lack of approval from the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) and the Federal Executive Council.
Some of the specific allegations include:
-Irregular Payment: INEC paid over N5.3 billion to a contractor for smart card readers without approval from BPP or the Federal Executive Council.
– Lack of Documentation: INEC failed to provide evidence of supplies or proof of due procurement process for ballot papers and result sheets worth N4.5 billion.
– Questionable Contracts: INEC awarded contracts worth N41 billion for printing election materials without due process.
– Overpriced Vehicles: INEC paid N74 million per Toyota Land Cruiser, despite market surveys showing they cost no more than N50 million each.
SERAP argues that INEC must operate without corruption to ensure free and fair elections and uphold Nigerians’ right to participate in the electoral process.
The implications:
The implications of SERAP’s lawsuit against INEC over the missing N55.9 billion election funds are significant.
If INEC is found guilty, it could lead to:
– Loss of Public Trust: The alleged mismanagement of funds could erode Nigerians’ confidence in the electoral process, making them question the legitimacy of future elections.
– Corruption Prosecution: Those involved in the alleged corruption, including contractors, could face prosecution and penalties.
– Improved Transparency: A court ruling in favor of SERAP could compel INEC to be more transparent in its financial dealings, setting a precedent for future elections.
– Accountability: INEC would be required to account for the missing funds, potentially leading to recovery and reimbursement.
The lawsuit highlights the need for INEC to ensure transparency and accountability in its operations. As SERAP argues, “INEC cannot ensure impartial administration of future elections if these allegations are not satisfactorily addressed.
